|
|
Geneseo Republic - Geneseo, IL
A blog 'for independent minds'
Taxing terminology
email print
About this blog
Opinion page editor Rick Holmes and other writers blog about national politics and issues. Holmes & Co. is a Blog for Independent Minds, a place for a free-flowing discussion of policy, news and opinion. This blog is the online cousin of the Opinion ...
X
Political Views
Opinion page editor Rick Holmes and other writers blog about national politics and issues. Holmes & Co. is a Blog for Independent Minds, a place for a free-flowing discussion of policy, news and opinion. This blog is the online cousin of the Opinion section of the MetroWest Daily News in Framingham, Mass. As such, our focus starts there and spreads to include Massachusetts, the nation and the world. Since successful blogs create communities of readers and writers, we hope the \x34& Co.\x34 will also come to include you.
Recent Posts
June 16, 2014 11:10 a.m.
June 16, 2014 11:10 a.m.
June 15, 2014 5:10 p.m.
June 13, 2014 5:10 p.m.
June 13, 2014 5:10 p.m.
Nov. 10, 2012 12:01 a.m.



I write today about what political insiders call a messaging mistake President Obama and other Democrats have been making for years in talking about the Bush tax cuts:



The long-held Democratic position states that the Bush tax cuts must not be extended “for those earning more than $250,000 a year.” This is divisive, critics say, pitting the poor and middle class against the well-to-do. Besides, $250,000 a year doesn’t sound super-wealthy here in Massachusetts.

In addition to being divisive and scary, the typical formulation of President Obama’s position is inaccurate. Income tax rates are marginal, which means they apply not to all the earnings of individual filers, but to adjusted earnings above a certain level.

Thus, it would be more accurate, and more politically palatable, to put it this way: Under the president’s plan, every taxpayer will be treated the same. The first $250,000 of a couple’s taxable income will be taxed at the Bush rates. Income over $250,000 will be taxed at the previous, Clinton-era tax rates.

Doesn’t that sound less onerous?


I have no idea how they’ve gotten this so wrong.  Elizabeth Warren used the typical formulation when I spoke with her in October, and I explained my position.  “I never thought of it like that,” she said. “I’ll use that.”




I haven’t heard her use it yet, but there’s time.


Recent Posts

    latest blogs

    • Community
    • National